The Letter - 4 August 2014

12.5% company tax rate
http://client.minervamail.com/images/act/linesmall.gif
Cutting the company tax rate to 12.5% will boast GDP growth by 1%.  As New Zealand’s best estimated long term growth rate is 3% this is a huge increase.  It is close to an economic silver bullet.  It is the best new idea any party has come up with for years.  Jamie Whyte and ACT’s policy team have reviewed the international research.  There is now case after case showing firstly how damaging high company tax rates are to growth.  A high company tax rate discourages investment.  Lower investment results in less employment.  New Zealand’s relatively high company tax rate is a large part of the reason New Zealand’s real wages are low.  When the company tax rate is reduced investment increases, (projects that were uneconomic become viable), increased growth leads to increased employment.  The higher real wages come largely because the increased investment leads to a productivity improvement making higher real wages viable. 

 

It is a global economy
http://client.minervamail.com/images/act/linesmall.gif
New Zealand is competing for capital against the world.  When we have a high tax on investment the capital just goes elsewhere.  It is not just Ireland that has shown the economic benefit of a low company tax rate. Ireland’s present woes came from an unrestrained banking sector, property bubble and poor public financial management, yet the country’s low company tax rate is helping its rapid recovery. We can observe how high company tax rates damage growth in federal systems, such as USA and Canada. Conversely, examples from those countries show how cutting the Company Tax rate increases growth, jobs and real wages. French economic growth is stunted by a complex, high tax regime.

 

ACT has published the research
http://client.minervamail.com/images/act/linesmall.gif
Jamie Whyte has released the international research that supports cutting the Company Tax Rate.  It is on ACT’s website and is worth a read www.act.org.nz . ACT has also put out how to fund it. Company Tax does not raise very much. Eliminate all corporate welfare, which is just crony capitalism, politicians picking ‘winners’, and get rid of the ETS, which even the Greens admit is having no effect on global warming – just gesture politics.       

 

TV debate tonight Native Affairs Maori TV 8.30pm

http://client.minervamail.com/images/act/linesmall.gif
Jamie Whyte has been issuing a series of background papers most of which have been ignored by the media.  A proposal that we should have equality before the law, posted three days after the speech was given to no media coverage, has produced a media storm.  Jamie Whyte has not retreated and has shown he is made of strong stuff.  Jamie tells The Letter that many of the journalists who have rung him clearly have not read the speech.  Not having read the speech is the only charitable explanation for the Race Relations Conciliator’s intemperate personal attack.  Nowhere in the legislation Dame Susan Devoy is paid $220,000 a year to administer does it say it is part of her job to publicly attack a candidate for office who having said he is against racial discrimination.  Dame Susan is debating Jamie Whyte tonight on Native Affairs Maori TV at 8.30pm and we look forward to hear why equality before the law is wrong.

 

Media bias
http://client.minervamail.com/images/act/linesmall.gif
We have had a look at what the journalists attacking Jamie are saying.  Very few address what he has said.  The Australian Fairfax group has resolved the issue by pretending it has not happened.  (Print media blackouts used to be effective, but now, in the age of Facebook and talkback radio, newspapers  are just made to look irrelevant or biased.  Not one commentator has defended the example of discrimination Jamie gave.  AT our universities today there are students from state house backgrounds who have been refused a place on courses in favour of students from privileged private schools because the state house student’s parents are the wrong race.  We are also waiting for a media outlet to publish what Jamie Whyte actually said.  We said to one journalist who was attacking Jamie as a racist “Have you read his speech?”  Answer “No.  I do not read what racists write”.  Have a read yourself and you be the judge www.act.org.nz    

 

Epsom is the key
http://client.minervamail.com/images/act/linesmall.gif
The reason John Key said last week “I am encouraging Epsom voters to support he ACT candidate” is because in the latest Roy Morgan poll ACT winning Epsom makes John Key PM.   It is the same reason Internet Party leader Laila Harre and John Minto have urged their supporters to vote National to defeat David Seymour.  After wondering why John Key has not done a deal with the Conservatives, Colin Craig  then tries to help Labour in Epsom.  John Key did look hard at an accommodation with the Conservatives but decided the fruit loops are unelectable. If Colin Craig had door knocked on 10,000 doors in East Coast Bays, like David Seymour has done in Epsom, the answer might have been different.  If Colin had not told us all that it is a “no brainer” Christine Rankin would stand in Upper Harbour against Hon Paula Bennett, then we might not think it is brainless for her to stand in Epsom.  By Writ Day she will be the candidate for Mangere.   

 

A Labour MP in favour of productivity

http://client.minervamail.com/images/act/linesmall.gif
Last week Parliament heard a record number of valedictories.  The best was from someone many MPs had never heard give a speech, the long serving assistant Speaker Ross Robertson, MP for Manukau East. Being working class and socially conservative Ross would never be selected by today’s Labour party.  It is years since the whips have let him ask an oral question.  While overlooked in this country for promotion MPs around the world elected Ross the chairman of their international association.  Ross’s speech covered issues no Labour MP talks about: the importance of productivity, ethics and why the Official Information ACT should be extended to Parliament and MPs’ spending.  Readers interested in a fine example of Parliamentary speaking should view the YouTube clip.  We will never see a speech like that from a Labour MP again. Go to http://www.parliament.nz/en-nz/pb/debates/debates/drafts/50HansY_20140730/draft-transcript-wednesday-30-july-2014

 

Please feel free to forward this letter to your friends and colleagues

If you get this letter from a friend, you can Click Here to Subscribe to The Letter.

The Letter - 4 August 2014

12.5% company tax rate
http://client.minervamail.com/images/act/linesmall.gif
Cutting the company tax rate to 12.5% will boast GDP growth by 1%.  As New Zealand’s best estimated long term growth rate is 3% this is a huge increase.  It is close to an economic silver bullet.  It is the best new idea any party has come up with for years.  Jamie Whyte and ACT’s policy team have reviewed the international research.  There is now case after case showing firstly how damaging high company tax rates are to growth.  A high company tax rate discourages investment.  Lower investment results in less employment.  New Zealand’s relatively high company tax rate is a large part of the reason New Zealand’s real wages are low.  When the company tax rate is reduced investment increases, (projects that were uneconomic become viable), increased growth leads to increased employment.  The higher real wages come largely because the increased investment leads to a productivity improvement making higher real wages viable. 

 

It is a global economy
http://client.minervamail.com/images/act/linesmall.gif
New Zealand is competing for capital against the world.  When we have a high tax on investment the capital just goes elsewhere.  It is not just Ireland that has shown the economic benefit of a low company tax rate. Ireland’s present woes came from an unrestrained banking sector, property bubble and poor public financial management, yet the country’s low company tax rate is helping its rapid recovery. We can observe how high company tax rates damage growth in federal systems, such as USA and Canada. Conversely, examples from those countries show how cutting the Company Tax rate increases growth, jobs and real wages. French economic growth is stunted by a complex, high tax regime.

 

ACT has published the research
http://client.minervamail.com/images/act/linesmall.gif
Jamie Whyte has released the international research that supports cutting the Company Tax Rate.  It is on ACT’s website and is worth a read www.act.org.nz . ACT has also put out how to fund it. Company Tax does not raise very much. Eliminate all corporate welfare, which is just crony capitalism, politicians picking ‘winners’, and get rid of the ETS, which even the Greens admit is having no effect on global warming – just gesture politics.       

 

TV debate tonight Native Affairs Maori TV 8.30pm

http://client.minervamail.com/images/act/linesmall.gif
Jamie Whyte has been issuing a series of background papers most of which have been ignored by the media.  A proposal that we should have equality before the law, posted three days after the speech was given to no media coverage, has produced a media storm.  Jamie Whyte has not retreated and has shown he is made of strong stuff.  Jamie tells The Letter that many of the journalists who have rung him clearly have not read the speech.  Not having read the speech is the only charitable explanation for the Race Relations Conciliator’s intemperate personal attack.  Nowhere in the legislation Dame Susan Devoy is paid $220,000 a year to administer does it say it is part of her job to publicly attack a candidate for office who having said he is against racial discrimination.  Dame Susan is debating Jamie Whyte tonight on Native Affairs Maori TV at 8.30pm and we look forward to hear why equality before the law is wrong.

 

Media bias
http://client.minervamail.com/images/act/linesmall.gif
We have had a look at what the journalists attacking Jamie are saying.  Very few address what he has said.  The Australian Fairfax group has resolved the issue by pretending it has not happened.  (Print media blackouts used to be effective, but now, in the age of Facebook and talkback radio, newspapers  are just made to look irrelevant or biased.  Not one commentator has defended the example of discrimination Jamie gave.  AT our universities today there are students from state house backgrounds who have been refused a place on courses in favour of students from privileged private schools because the state house student’s parents are the wrong race.  We are also waiting for a media outlet to publish what Jamie Whyte actually said.  We said to one journalist who was attacking Jamie as a racist “Have you read his speech?”  Answer “No.  I do not read what racists write”.  Have a read yourself and you be the judge www.act.org.nz    

 

Epsom is the key
http://client.minervamail.com/images/act/linesmall.gif
The reason John Key said last week “I am encouraging Epsom voters to support he ACT candidate” is because in the latest Roy Morgan poll ACT winning Epsom makes John Key PM.   It is the same reason Internet Party leader Laila Harre and John Minto have urged their supporters to vote National to defeat David Seymour.  After wondering why John Key has not done a deal with the Conservatives, Colin Craig  then tries to help Labour in Epsom.  John Key did look hard at an accommodation with the Conservatives but decided the fruit loops are unelectable. If Colin Craig had door knocked on 10,000 doors in East Coast Bays, like David Seymour has done in Epsom, the answer might have been different.  If Colin had not told us all that it is a “no brainer” Christine Rankin would stand in Upper Harbour against Hon Paula Bennett, then we might not think it is brainless for her to stand in Epsom.  By Writ Day she will be the candidate for Mangere.   

 

A Labour MP in favour of productivity

http://client.minervamail.com/images/act/linesmall.gif
Last week Parliament heard a record number of valedictories.  The best was from someone many MPs had never heard give a speech, the long serving assistant Speaker Ross Robertson, MP for Manukau East. Being working class and socially conservative Ross would never be selected by today’s Labour party.  It is years since the whips have let him ask an oral question.  While overlooked in this country for promotion MPs around the world elected Ross the chairman of their international association.  Ross’s speech covered issues no Labour MP talks about: the importance of productivity, ethics and why the Official Information ACT should be extended to Parliament and MPs’ spending.  Readers interested in a fine example of Parliamentary speaking should view the YouTube clip.  We will never see a speech like that from a Labour MP again. Go to http://www.parliament.nz/en-nz/pb/debates/debates/drafts/50HansY_20140730/draft-transcript-wednesday-30-july-2014

 

Please feel free to forward this letter to your friends and colleagues

If you get this letter from a friend, you can Click Here to Subscribe to The Letter.

The Letter - 23 June 2014

 

No he can’t but the left still will

David Cunliffe cannot win from here.  He cannot tell the country that  Judith Collins, Maurice Williamson and Michael Woodhouse, should all resign and say that in a ministry he led they would all be gone.  He cannot say, "forgetting is no excuse".  And then have it revealed that he himself lobbied on behalf of the very same businessman.  His defences just make it worse, “a staffer wrote the letter”, “I was not lobbying I was only asking how the application was going” – the Maurice Williamson defence.  Forgetting was an explanation that he has told Parliament repeatedly is not acceptable in a government he seeks to lead. Cunliffe is discredited but that does not mean the left will not win the 2014 election.

 

It is a knockout

If failing to remember he had lobbied for the infamous Mr Liu was the Leader of the Opposition’s only mistake he might recover, but it is not.  David Cunliffe has built his whole case for a change of government on a narrative that National is corrupt.  He has produced no evidence except that some Chinese businessmen have donated to National.  In David Cunliffe’s narrative, that is corrupt.  It now appears Labour itself has sought and received donations from Chinese businessmen.  After eight months, David Cunliffe has only managed to score one knockout on himself.

 

He has got it all wrong

Cunliffe must be the most inept Labour leader ever, despite strong competition.  First he told the caucus that David Shearer could not win – oh what they would give for Shearer’s polling.  Then he said the missing one million are all Labour voters so the party could go left.  No they are not, many are ACT voters.  Then he decided he could make the case that National was corrupt.  National may be a lot of things but the party is not corrupt.  National is the least corrupt governing party in the world.  Labour in contrast has been found by the Auditor-General to have repeatedly misused taxpayer money to fund its campaigns. Remember the "pledge card" debacle? A leader with some ability to reflect would have thought, “Before I throw this mud could it boomerang?”

 

Will they?

If Labour wants to salvage something from the wreck then they need to replace Cunliffe now.  The Australian Labor Party, the most successful Labor Party in the world, would not hesitate.  Any party that claims to be able to govern should be able to replace its leader.  If David Cunliffe really is their best MP, what does that say about Labour? David Cunliffe is so bad half the caucus would be better.  David Shearer or Phil Goff or Annette King, if they want experience, Grant Robertson who was the caucus choice in the primary, or David Parker or Andrew Little if they want someone new.  Labour will still lose to John Key but not so badly. A real leader is the person who is willing to take over as captain of the Titanic after it has hit the iceberg.  Has Labour got a real leader?  If we were in the caucus we would go for Annette King.

 

Demoralising

The Labour caucus morale is zero.  They tried to tell David Cunliffe that a dozen MPs had accepted donations from Chinese businessmen.  Labour MPs also know that there is more to come.  National is in no hurry to drop the next bombshell.

If elections are about ideas, the sort of country we are, whether we are more free enterprise or more socialist, then the Left have already won the 2014 election.  David Cunliffe was right when he said “Labour wrote this year’s election budget”, a budget that is the government’s manifesto for the next three years.  We cannot think of a single policy in this year’s budget that could not have been in a Michael Cullen budget.

 

National is the reason New Zealand is a socialist state

Jamie Whyte made an observation about Labour’s proposal to make the KiwiSaver scheme compulsory that is truly profound.  Labour can only make its proposal to use the force of the state to oblige young people to contribute to low return savings schemes, with an average historical return of 3%, against repaying a mortgage, with an average return of 6%  because National has continued with Labour’s KiwiSaver Scheme. Jamie points out that National has continued with all of Labour’s poor quality spending.  We still have a Labour government, only the name and the personnel changed. 

 

What is National’s excuse?

We expect Labour governments to propose collectivist compulsory solutions, it is what they believe in.  What is National’s reason?  National MPs say they need to be centrist to win elections.  Follow this logic and we end up with Muldoonism again, a National government that is even more Labour than Labour.  National’s other line is if you do not vote National you will get a Labour government.  Well that line has just lost its power to scare.  Voters can now start to ask the question National cannot answer, which is, “What is the point of voting National if what you get is Labour policies?”   

 

Only way to make a difference

Jamie Whyte is absolutely correct when he observes the only way not to get Labour policies is to elect a number of ACT MPs.  Jamie Whyte’s blog on why he opposes compulsory super is worth reading: http://www.act.org.nz/?q=posts/labour-engages-in-schoolyard-behaviour

The Letter - 23 June 2014

 

No he can’t but the left still will

David Cunliffe cannot win from here.  He cannot tell the country that  Judith Collins, Maurice Williamson and Michael Woodhouse, should all resign and say that in a ministry he led they would all be gone.  He cannot say, "forgetting is no excuse".  And then have it revealed that he himself lobbied on behalf of the very same businessman.  His defences just make it worse, “a staffer wrote the letter”, “I was not lobbying I was only asking how the application was going” – the Maurice Williamson defence.  Forgetting was an explanation that he has told Parliament repeatedly is not acceptable in a government he seeks to lead. Cunliffe is discredited but that does not mean the left will not win the 2014 election.

 

It is a knockout

If failing to remember he had lobbied for the infamous Mr Liu was the Leader of the Opposition’s only mistake he might recover, but it is not.  David Cunliffe has built his whole case for a change of government on a narrative that National is corrupt.  He has produced no evidence except that some Chinese businessmen have donated to National.  In David Cunliffe’s narrative, that is corrupt.  It now appears Labour itself has sought and received donations from Chinese businessmen.  After eight months, David Cunliffe has only managed to score one knockout on himself.

 

He has got it all wrong

Cunliffe must be the most inept Labour leader ever, despite strong competition.  First he told the caucus that David Shearer could not win – oh what they would give for Shearer’s polling.  Then he said the missing one million are all Labour voters so the party could go left.  No they are not, many are ACT voters.  Then he decided he could make the case that National was corrupt.  National may be a lot of things but the party is not corrupt.  National is the least corrupt governing party in the world.  Labour in contrast has been found by the Auditor-General to have repeatedly misused taxpayer money to fund its campaigns. Remember the "pledge card" debacle? A leader with some ability to reflect would have thought, “Before I throw this mud could it boomerang?”

 

Will they?

If Labour wants to salvage something from the wreck then they need to replace Cunliffe now.  The Australian Labor Party, the most successful Labor Party in the world, would not hesitate.  Any party that claims to be able to govern should be able to replace its leader.  If David Cunliffe really is their best MP, what does that say about Labour? David Cunliffe is so bad half the caucus would be better.  David Shearer or Phil Goff or Annette King, if they want experience, Grant Robertson who was the caucus choice in the primary, or David Parker or Andrew Little if they want someone new.  Labour will still lose to John Key but not so badly. A real leader is the person who is willing to take over as captain of the Titanic after it has hit the iceberg.  Has Labour got a real leader?  If we were in the caucus we would go for Annette King.

 

Demoralising

The Labour caucus morale is zero.  They tried to tell David Cunliffe that a dozen MPs had accepted donations from Chinese businessmen.  Labour MPs also know that there is more to come.  National is in no hurry to drop the next bombshell.

If elections are about ideas, the sort of country we are, whether we are more free enterprise or more socialist, then the Left have already won the 2014 election.  David Cunliffe was right when he said “Labour wrote this year’s election budget”, a budget that is the government’s manifesto for the next three years.  We cannot think of a single policy in this year’s budget that could not have been in a Michael Cullen budget.

 

National is the reason New Zealand is a socialist state

Jamie Whyte made an observation about Labour’s proposal to make the KiwiSaver scheme compulsory that is truly profound.  Labour can only make its proposal to use the force of the state to oblige young people to contribute to low return savings schemes, with an average historical return of 3%, against repaying a mortgage, with an average return of 6%  because National has continued with Labour’s KiwiSaver Scheme. Jamie points out that National has continued with all of Labour’s poor quality spending.  We still have a Labour government, only the name and the personnel changed. 

 

What is National’s excuse?

We expect Labour governments to propose collectivist compulsory solutions, it is what they believe in.  What is National’s reason?  National MPs say they need to be centrist to win elections.  Follow this logic and we end up with Muldoonism again, a National government that is even more Labour than Labour.  National’s other line is if you do not vote National you will get a Labour government.  Well that line has just lost its power to scare.  Voters can now start to ask the question National cannot answer, which is, “What is the point of voting National if what you get is Labour policies?”   

 

Only way to make a difference

Jamie Whyte is absolutely correct when he observes the only way not to get Labour policies is to elect a number of ACT MPs.  Jamie Whyte’s blog on why he opposes compulsory super is worth reading: http://www.act.org.nz/?q=posts/labour-engages-in-schoolyard-behaviour

The Letter 16 June 2014

16 June 2014

 

The ‘Missing’ 100,000


What happens to the last election’s non-vote may determine this year’s election.  David Cunliffe won the Labour primary promising to take Labour to the left to mobilise the “one million” non-voters to turn out.  Like much of David Cunliffe’s rhetoric it was careless.  There were not a million non-voters, 800,000 is closer to the mark.  In a usual election, around 500,000 do not vote.  Of the extra 300,000 non-voters, it turns out many are from Right/centre voting electorates.  Labour’s vote was down 180,000, so the other 120,000 voters came from somewhere else.  ACT in its 6 elections has averaged 95,000 voters.  In 2011 ACT’s vote collapsed. Getting the ACT non-vote to the polling booth grows the Right/Centre vote.  Last election the 120,000 non-voting Right/Centre supporters almost gifted the election to Phil Goff. If they had all voted, ACT would have had six seats and National would not need to rely on the Maori Party.  

 

Where is the Evidence?


New Zealand does not allow exit polls on Election Day. Even exit polls taken a day later are notoriously unreliable.  Oddly, people quickly convince themselves that they did vote - and  voted for the winner too. Only marked rolls let you know who really did and didn’t vote, and they are sealed after counting. So we do not know for sure who the non-voters are.  The evidence that 95,000 are ACT voters is a) ACT’s vote collapsed, so those who voted for ACT in the previous 5 elections went somewhere else, b) non-voting increased the most in electorates where ACT is strong, c) anecdotal evidence from ACT supporters that they did not vote last election, and d) the results we’ve received this year from our extensive polling.   

 

The Right/Centre thinks National is Labour-lite


In ACT’s 2014 voter poll of the views of the Right/Centre in Epsom, around 17 percent of the electorate reveals that they feel betrayed by National: “What is the point of voting National, if what you get is Labour policies?”, is a frequent observation. This group will only vote National to stop a Labour government. Last election they were sure John Key was going to win. This year they also think John Key will win.  If the election was tomorrow, 100,000 (maybe more) would stay at home. Is ‘good vibe’ complacency a trait of the Right/Centre? If so, getting 100,000 potential ACT voters to use the ballot box is vital in 2014.

 

Only ACT


The National 2014 election year budget was brilliant politics; it allowed National to grab Labour voters. But it also convinced Right/Centre voters that National is Labour-lite. Only Jamie Whyte has a chance to motivate the missing 100,000 Right/Centre voters to go to the polls. ACT’s polling reveals that Right/Centre voters have not only a favourable view of Jamie Whyte but they have an unfavourable view of John Key, who they regard as being pale pink. Jamie has his job cut out for him, as Right/Centre voters think the job of being ACT Leader is a very tough job and they are not sure if anyone can do it. If there is a silver lining to the John Banks court case, it is that it proved Jamie Whyte can take tough decisions.

 

He Can Pick Issues Too

When he became leader Jamie Whyte had to pick the issues to highlight without the benefit of any polling.  Jamie chose to highlight the 120,000 burglaries that occur annually and to float a solution - 3 strikes for burglary then 3 years jail. The media commentators were universal in their derision. ACT’s polling subsequent to Jamie Whyte’s election shows he was spot on. The Right/Centre is angry that National has frozen the Police budget, that burglary is out of control and that burglars have nothing to fear when they are caught – many professional burglars have double digit convictions and records of offending during parole.  Since National was elected, over 750,000 people have been directly affected by a burglary.  Jamie then produced a detailed and accurately-costed alternative budget. Showing how by cutting middle class and corporate welfare, the tax rate could be lowered to 24 cents was also inspired. Tax rates may not appear as an issue in public and media polls but that is because most people who are polled pay no tax in net terms; They receive more in benefits than they pay in tax. But 20% of the electorate - including the missing 100,000 ACT voters - are real taxpayers and they hear Jamie’s lower and flatter taxes message and like it. Jamie Whyte is the only person who may be able to motivate the Right/Centre non-vote to go to the polls.

 

Internet-Mana Party

I-Predict is now forecasting that the leader of the Maori Party, Te Ururoa Flavell, will lose his seat to Internet-Mana candidate Annette Sykes.  The Letter thinks so too.  Flavell destabilised the Maori Party to get the leadership from Pita Sharples and then has had no idea how or where to lead the Maori Party.  Just being in government is not enough.  No approach has been made to the party’s largest donor.  We see no sign of electoral activity.  Annette ran a vigorous campaign last election on no money. With a four million dollar war chest she can out spend Flavell with some ease. The irony is that if Annette wins on current polling, the Internet Party leader Laila Harre, who has the top list place, will miss out.  Electorate seats are deducted from the Party list seats and Internet-Mana now needs over 2% to get a list seat.

 

Don Nicolson for ACT

ACT has selected former Federated Farmer’s President Don Nicolson to run for the Clutha-Southland seat. During his time as President of Federated Farmers, Don was a strong advocate of property rights and led the campaign against the Resource Management Act, a piece of legislation that has devastated the viability of many farmers.  Regrettably, Federated Farmers present leadership thinks property rights are a lost cause and have instituted a policy of appeasement. Putting it boldly, appeasement did not stop Hitler and it will not stop the environmental Nazis. Don’s selection sends a clear message that ACT is the only Party willing to say no to the environmental Nazis.  In rural New Zealand, and going by the reception he received at Field Days, Don’s selection is big news.  

 

Sunday Series

We are often asked “What is Jamie Whyte like?” Jamie has recorded a Sunday series of YouTube clips that are on www.act.org.nz . He is speaking in his own way and the results are quite revealing. We think he has got what it takes. Judge for yourself.  

 
Subscribe The Letter Here

The Letter 16 June 2014

16 June 2014

 

The ‘Missing’ 100,000


What happens to the last election’s non-vote may determine this year’s election.  David Cunliffe won the Labour primary promising to take Labour to the left to mobilise the “one million” non-voters to turn out.  Like much of David Cunliffe’s rhetoric it was careless.  There were not a million non-voters, 800,000 is closer to the mark.  In a usual election, around 500,000 do not vote.  Of the extra 300,000 non-voters, it turns out many are from Right/centre voting electorates.  Labour’s vote was down 180,000, so the other 120,000 voters came from somewhere else.  ACT in its 6 elections has averaged 95,000 voters.  In 2011 ACT’s vote collapsed. Getting the ACT non-vote to the polling booth grows the Right/Centre vote.  Last election the 120,000 non-voting Right/Centre supporters almost gifted the election to Phil Goff. If they had all voted, ACT would have had six seats and National would not need to rely on the Maori Party.  

 

Where is the Evidence?


New Zealand does not allow exit polls on Election Day. Even exit polls taken a day later are notoriously unreliable.  Oddly, people quickly convince themselves that they did vote - and  voted for the winner too. Only marked rolls let you know who really did and didn’t vote, and they are sealed after counting. So we do not know for sure who the non-voters are.  The evidence that 95,000 are ACT voters is a) ACT’s vote collapsed, so those who voted for ACT in the previous 5 elections went somewhere else, b) non-voting increased the most in electorates where ACT is strong, c) anecdotal evidence from ACT supporters that they did not vote last election, and d) the results we’ve received this year from our extensive polling.   

 

The Right/Centre thinks National is Labour-lite


In ACT’s 2014 voter poll of the views of the Right/Centre in Epsom, around 17 percent of the electorate reveals that they feel betrayed by National: “What is the point of voting National, if what you get is Labour policies?”, is a frequent observation. This group will only vote National to stop a Labour government. Last election they were sure John Key was going to win. This year they also think John Key will win.  If the election was tomorrow, 100,000 (maybe more) would stay at home. Is ‘good vibe’ complacency a trait of the Right/Centre? If so, getting 100,000 potential ACT voters to use the ballot box is vital in 2014.

 

Only ACT


The National 2014 election year budget was brilliant politics; it allowed National to grab Labour voters. But it also convinced Right/Centre voters that National is Labour-lite. Only Jamie Whyte has a chance to motivate the missing 100,000 Right/Centre voters to go to the polls. ACT’s polling reveals that Right/Centre voters have not only a favourable view of Jamie Whyte but they have an unfavourable view of John Key, who they regard as being pale pink. Jamie has his job cut out for him, as Right/Centre voters think the job of being ACT Leader is a very tough job and they are not sure if anyone can do it. If there is a silver lining to the John Banks court case, it is that it proved Jamie Whyte can take tough decisions.

 

He Can Pick Issues Too

When he became leader Jamie Whyte had to pick the issues to highlight without the benefit of any polling.  Jamie chose to highlight the 120,000 burglaries that occur annually and to float a solution - 3 strikes for burglary then 3 years jail. The media commentators were universal in their derision. ACT’s polling subsequent to Jamie Whyte’s election shows he was spot on. The Right/Centre is angry that National has frozen the Police budget, that burglary is out of control and that burglars have nothing to fear when they are caught – many professional burglars have double digit convictions and records of offending during parole.  Since National was elected, over 750,000 people have been directly affected by a burglary.  Jamie then produced a detailed and accurately-costed alternative budget. Showing how by cutting middle class and corporate welfare, the tax rate could be lowered to 24 cents was also inspired. Tax rates may not appear as an issue in public and media polls but that is because most people who are polled pay no tax in net terms; They receive more in benefits than they pay in tax. But 20% of the electorate - including the missing 100,000 ACT voters - are real taxpayers and they hear Jamie’s lower and flatter taxes message and like it. Jamie Whyte is the only person who may be able to motivate the Right/Centre non-vote to go to the polls.

 

Internet-Mana Party

I-Predict is now forecasting that the leader of the Maori Party, Te Ururoa Flavell, will lose his seat to Internet-Mana candidate Annette Sykes.  The Letter thinks so too.  Flavell destabilised the Maori Party to get the leadership from Pita Sharples and then has had no idea how or where to lead the Maori Party.  Just being in government is not enough.  No approach has been made to the party’s largest donor.  We see no sign of electoral activity.  Annette ran a vigorous campaign last election on no money. With a four million dollar war chest she can out spend Flavell with some ease. The irony is that if Annette wins on current polling, the Internet Party leader Laila Harre, who has the top list place, will miss out.  Electorate seats are deducted from the Party list seats and Internet-Mana now needs over 2% to get a list seat.

 

Don Nicolson for ACT

ACT has selected former Federated Farmer’s President Don Nicolson to run for the Clutha-Southland seat. During his time as President of Federated Farmers, Don was a strong advocate of property rights and led the campaign against the Resource Management Act, a piece of legislation that has devastated the viability of many farmers.  Regrettably, Federated Farmers present leadership thinks property rights are a lost cause and have instituted a policy of appeasement. Putting it boldly, appeasement did not stop Hitler and it will not stop the environmental Nazis. Don’s selection sends a clear message that ACT is the only Party willing to say no to the environmental Nazis.  In rural New Zealand, and going by the reception he received at Field Days, Don’s selection is big news.  

 

Sunday Series

We are often asked “What is Jamie Whyte like?” Jamie has recorded a Sunday series of YouTube clips that are on www.act.org.nz . He is speaking in his own way and the results are quite revealing. We think he has got what it takes. Judge for yourself.  

 
Subscribe The Letter Here

The Letter - 3 June 2014

http://www.act.org.nz/sites/default/files/civicrm/persist/contribute/images/theLetter.gif

3 June 2014

 

Thursday is D-Day
http://www.act.org.nz/sites/default/files/civicrm/persist/contribute/images/yellowBar.gif

The judge has reserved his decision in the case against John Banks to Thursday.  Whatever is the decision, the verdict will impact the election.  For John Banks a guilty verdict would be a tragic end to a distinguished career.  His seat would be declared vacant. Without John Banks’ vote National will find parliament difficult.  The Opposition will be exultant.  Trevor Mallard laid the Police complaint. Dotcom will have had his revenge.  TV3 gave an indication of how they will cover a guilty verdict.  While ACT’s polling does not record the case as being a factor it must be. After John resigned as Leader, ACT fell to zero in public polls.  

 

What if John Banks is found not guilty?
http://www.act.org.nz/sites/default/files/civicrm/persist/contribute/images/yellowBar.gif​   
The Letter who has known John Banks for 30 years has never believed he would knowingly fill in a false return.  Besides, there was no need to do so, a motive was missing. A not guilty verdict will vindicate John.  The impact on the seat of Epsom will be immediate.  The government will be secure.  The Opposition will be seen to have wasted a huge amount of time and money.  Dotcom’s credibility will take a big blow.  A number of commentators who were so sure John Banks was guilty will realise they have defamed him. A not guilty finding has to be good for ACT. 

 

John Banks is not guilty
http://www.act.org.nz/sites/default/files/civicrm/persist/contribute/images/yellowBar.gif
The media case against John Banks was built around a lunch at the Dotcom mansion, where Dotcom claimed, giving great detail, that donations were discussed.  John Banks said he could not remember the lunch, let alone the conversation.  “How could you forget a lunch at the Dotcom mansion?” said talk back radio, “he must be guilty”.  The evidence given in the trial shows no lunch on the date Dotcom claimed occurred.  It is a fabrication.  John Banks on that day was meeting with a South Auckland Community Police Officer.  Detail after detail has turned out under cross examination to be false.  Dotcom’s accountant, who claimed he had flown to Queenstown to deposit the cheques, suddenly could not remember anything when the bank record showed the cheques were actually banked at the local Albany branch, some 1,550 kilometres away.  John Banks’ QC has told the court that John is the victim of a conspiracy. The person who needs to worry about the verdict is the German.

 

Internet-Mana Party
http://www.act.org.nz/sites/default/files/civicrm/persist/contribute/images/yellowBar.gif
How could Laila Harre, perhaps the most extreme left wing MP ever to be a minister, lead a party founded by a German millionaire, who, according to the FBI, is the biggest criminal in New Zealand’s history?  Laila was a member of the Harry Holland brigade that travelled to Nicaragua to assist the Sandinistas.  Prominent in the Brigade were leading members of the Socialist Action, a Trotskyist communist party.  Laila Harre is literally a fellow traveller.  The left hate the Trotskyists because Leon Trotsky urged his followers to disguise their beliefs and join other parties and take them over.  Now does it make sense?

 

How will Internet-Mana poll?
http://www.act.org.nz/sites/default/files/civicrm/persist/contribute/images/yellowBar.gif
Possibly quite well.  Money by itself does not win elections but it helps. In Europe there are a number of parliaments, Italy and Iceland, where there are MPs representing the Pirate Parties, a plague on everything parties.  In New Zealand the “plague on everyone” party is founded by a real pirate.  Having a seat means all votes will count.  On the record of McGillicuddy Serious, the party could easily elect three MPs.  Enough to hold the balance.  The Letter has run into some young Maori who think when Dotcom talks about Internet freedom he means free Internet which they think is cool.  We doubt the party will be any more successful than Mana at attracting non-voters. The danger is that the wasted vote on the left will count and give the left an extra seat, something that in 2008 and 2011 would have ensured Labour remained in power. NZ voters tend to forget their history very quickly, unfortunately.

 

Who will lose?
http://www.act.org.nz/sites/default/files/civicrm/persist/contribute/images/yellowBar.gif
It is The Letter’s experience that attempts to rort the electoral system invariably rebound.  Right leaning voters may well decide to give more to counteract Mr Dotcom’s $3 million.  Dotcom may find himself otherwise detained, in which case we predict Hone and Laila will need to cash the cheque promptly.  Pressure is now on David Cunliffe to declare whether he will do an electoral deal with a party funded by Dotcom.  Is a government relying on the Internet-Mana party credible?  If the Judge rules that the evidence given against John Banks was false, then Hone might find the deal he has done hurts in his seat.  Thursday’s court decision is going to be important, and not just for John.  

 

Lastest poll in Epsom
http://www.act.org.nz/sites/default/files/civicrm/persist/contribute/images/yellowBar.gif
Analysis, reported in The Letter, shows that most of the increase in the 2011 non-vote was from the right.  Many ACT supporters who thought ACT was going to lose Epsom stayed at home. So Epsom is vital.  ACT has now done a commercial professional poll of 300 voters in Epsom.  It confirms the telephone and door canvass results: when the National vote splitters are added to the ACT vote, David Seymour is winning Epsom. The fight goes on.

 

Big tax on everything
http://www.act.org.nz/sites/default/files/civicrm/persist/contribute/images/yellowBar.gif
The Greens proposed carbon tax is a big tax on everything.  They have admitted what ACT has always said, the Emissions Trading Scheme does not work. Jamie Whyte has pointed out the Greens proposal will not just wreck the New Zealand economy, it will add to global warming.  NZ dairying even after transport costs causes less global warming than European dairy.  Milk production will move from carbon-taxed New Zealand to no carbon-taxed Europe. While we expect economic nonsense from the Greens, it is a worry that David Cunliffe has not ruled this out. See www.act.org.nz

 

The Letter - 3 June 2014

http://www.act.org.nz/sites/default/files/civicrm/persist/contribute/images/theLetter.gif

3 June 2014

 

Thursday is D-Day
http://www.act.org.nz/sites/default/files/civicrm/persist/contribute/images/yellowBar.gif

The judge has reserved his decision in the case against John Banks to Thursday.  Whatever is the decision, the verdict will impact the election.  For John Banks a guilty verdict would be a tragic end to a distinguished career.  His seat would be declared vacant. Without John Banks’ vote National will find parliament difficult.  The Opposition will be exultant.  Trevor Mallard laid the Police complaint. Dotcom will have had his revenge.  TV3 gave an indication of how they will cover a guilty verdict.  While ACT’s polling does not record the case as being a factor it must be. After John resigned as Leader, ACT fell to zero in public polls.  

 

What if John Banks is found not guilty?
http://www.act.org.nz/sites/default/files/civicrm/persist/contribute/images/yellowBar.gif​   
The Letter who has known John Banks for 30 years has never believed he would knowingly fill in a false return.  Besides, there was no need to do so, a motive was missing. A not guilty verdict will vindicate John.  The impact on the seat of Epsom will be immediate.  The government will be secure.  The Opposition will be seen to have wasted a huge amount of time and money.  Dotcom’s credibility will take a big blow.  A number of commentators who were so sure John Banks was guilty will realise they have defamed him. A not guilty finding has to be good for ACT. 

 

John Banks is not guilty
http://www.act.org.nz/sites/default/files/civicrm/persist/contribute/images/yellowBar.gif
The media case against John Banks was built around a lunch at the Dotcom mansion, where Dotcom claimed, giving great detail, that donations were discussed.  John Banks said he could not remember the lunch, let alone the conversation.  “How could you forget a lunch at the Dotcom mansion?” said talk back radio, “he must be guilty”.  The evidence given in the trial shows no lunch on the date Dotcom claimed occurred.  It is a fabrication.  John Banks on that day was meeting with a South Auckland Community Police Officer.  Detail after detail has turned out under cross examination to be false.  Dotcom’s accountant, who claimed he had flown to Queenstown to deposit the cheques, suddenly could not remember anything when the bank record showed the cheques were actually banked at the local Albany branch, some 1,550 kilometres away.  John Banks’ QC has told the court that John is the victim of a conspiracy. The person who needs to worry about the verdict is the German.

 

Internet-Mana Party
http://www.act.org.nz/sites/default/files/civicrm/persist/contribute/images/yellowBar.gif
How could Laila Harre, perhaps the most extreme left wing MP ever to be a minister, lead a party founded by a German millionaire, who, according to the FBI, is the biggest criminal in New Zealand’s history?  Laila was a member of the Harry Holland brigade that travelled to Nicaragua to assist the Sandinistas.  Prominent in the Brigade were leading members of the Socialist Action, a Trotskyist communist party.  Laila Harre is literally a fellow traveller.  The left hate the Trotskyists because Leon Trotsky urged his followers to disguise their beliefs and join other parties and take them over.  Now does it make sense?

 

How will Internet-Mana poll?
http://www.act.org.nz/sites/default/files/civicrm/persist/contribute/images/yellowBar.gif
Possibly quite well.  Money by itself does not win elections but it helps. In Europe there are a number of parliaments, Italy and Iceland, where there are MPs representing the Pirate Parties, a plague on everything parties.  In New Zealand the “plague on everyone” party is founded by a real pirate.  Having a seat means all votes will count.  On the record of McGillicuddy Serious, the party could easily elect three MPs.  Enough to hold the balance.  The Letter has run into some young Maori who think when Dotcom talks about Internet freedom he means free Internet which they think is cool.  We doubt the party will be any more successful than Mana at attracting non-voters. The danger is that the wasted vote on the left will count and give the left an extra seat, something that in 2008 and 2011 would have ensured Labour remained in power. NZ voters tend to forget their history very quickly, unfortunately.

 

Who will lose?
http://www.act.org.nz/sites/default/files/civicrm/persist/contribute/images/yellowBar.gif
It is The Letter’s experience that attempts to rort the electoral system invariably rebound.  Right leaning voters may well decide to give more to counteract Mr Dotcom’s $3 million.  Dotcom may find himself otherwise detained, in which case we predict Hone and Laila will need to cash the cheque promptly.  Pressure is now on David Cunliffe to declare whether he will do an electoral deal with a party funded by Dotcom.  Is a government relying on the Internet-Mana party credible?  If the Judge rules that the evidence given against John Banks was false, then Hone might find the deal he has done hurts in his seat.  Thursday’s court decision is going to be important, and not just for John.  

 

Lastest poll in Epsom
http://www.act.org.nz/sites/default/files/civicrm/persist/contribute/images/yellowBar.gif
Analysis, reported in The Letter, shows that most of the increase in the 2011 non-vote was from the right.  Many ACT supporters who thought ACT was going to lose Epsom stayed at home. So Epsom is vital.  ACT has now done a commercial professional poll of 300 voters in Epsom.  It confirms the telephone and door canvass results: when the National vote splitters are added to the ACT vote, David Seymour is winning Epsom. The fight goes on.

 

Big tax on everything
http://www.act.org.nz/sites/default/files/civicrm/persist/contribute/images/yellowBar.gif
The Greens proposed carbon tax is a big tax on everything.  They have admitted what ACT has always said, the Emissions Trading Scheme does not work. Jamie Whyte has pointed out the Greens proposal will not just wreck the New Zealand economy, it will add to global warming.  NZ dairying even after transport costs causes less global warming than European dairy.  Milk production will move from carbon-taxed New Zealand to no carbon-taxed Europe. While we expect economic nonsense from the Greens, it is a worry that David Cunliffe has not ruled this out. See www.act.org.nz

 

The Letter - 26 May 2014

26 May 2014

 

What a difference a budget makes


ACT has the best polling.  The party did a 2000 nationwide online survey of 2000 likely voters 5-12 May before the Budget 15 May. Comparing ACT’s poll with the TVNZ One poll yesterday it shows National got a big bounce out of the Budget.  The spectacular failure of the opposition to deliver any dirt on Judith Collins has also resulted in a blow back on NZ1st, Labour and the Greens.  

 

Right/Center voters unhappy                      

National producing Labour-lite policies may be electorally successful but ACT’s poll shows Right/center voters are not happy.  They know the government is wasting their money in health, education and welfare.

 

Most popular Right/Center politician

It is Jamie Whyte.  Public polls ask the wrong questions.  “Who do you want to be PM?” biases the result to the existing PM.  Political parties ask a much better question “Do you have a favourable/unfavourable opinion of…”  John Key is the most popular in the public polls but right/center voters (18% of the electorate) have an unfavourable view of Key, favourable 39% /unfavourable 52%.  Key is competing with David Cunliffe and just 13% of right/center voters have a favourable view of Cunliffe.  Jamie Whyte is the most popular leader with the right/center voters with 45% favourable to 22% unfavourable.

 

We were incredulous too

We said to our pollster “John Key is the most popular PM in the history of polling.  Are you sure Jamie Whyte is more popular?” Gene Ulm checked the results. “It is correct.  If we had realized Jamie Whyte after only 70 days as leader was so well known we would have asked more questions about him”.  As an aside the poll shows why John Key is so electable.  If you lead a major party what matters is your cross party appeal.  When many of your opponent’s supporters prefer you to their own leader you are hard to beat.  When you lead a third party then it is vital your supporters like you.  It is why NZ1ST gets votes.  ACT was not polling in depth Green supporters but the results show the Greens have a problem.  Green voters are gaining an unfavourable view of Russell “Aussie” Norman.  Not all Aussie reds are drinkable.

 

Good guys finish last

But they start first.  ACT has picked the right leader.  If voters have an unfavourable impression, as they do of David Cunliffe, then he is the wrong person to be carrying the message.  (The right message carrier for Labour was Shane Jones.  Watch the hidden microphone pick up Hone telling Shane to join NZ1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ff_T6IGfjiA). If voters have a favourable impression of the message carrier as they do of Jamie Whyte then they will listen to the message.

 

ACT is on one percent

Actually that is good news.  It shows ACT’s poll is accurate.  In this massive survey of voters’ attitudes the voters are told what ACT’s policies are.  At the end of the survey voters are asked again how they are voting.  It is duplicates what happens in an election campaign.  In the post survey question 11% say they are considering voting ACT.  That is 12 MPs. 

 

Epsom is crucial

Many of the 11 percent are waiting to see if ACT will win Epsom.  ACT is conducting a telephone survey of the whole Epsom electorate.  David Seymour is now narrowly in first place.  But when National voters are asked if they will vote tactically to ensure John Key is PM a further 40% say they will vote ACT. Even if Labour voters vote tactically they cannot stop David Seymour from winning. This is a better position at this stage than Rodney Hide was polling when he won.  David has momentum. ACT will win Epsom.   

 

Oravida is a non-issue

ACT’s big poll was taken at the height of the “cash for access” scandal.  It shows the issue has not changed anyone’s vote. The Opposition has wasted a month of parliamentary time.  Promising a king hit and delivering hot air has hurt the Opposition’s credibility. Calling your opponent a paedophile has shocked voters.  Even the Opposition’s cheer leaders in talk back radio do not want to go down that route. 

 

Wrong issue

We always thought that the Opposition was mistaken in picking election funding.  It reminds voters that the Auditor–General said Labour misappropriated hundreds of thousands of dollars to fund their elections.  It reminds voters of the Owen Glenn affair.  Why was Russell Norman visiting the Dotcom mansion? It also reminds voters that over the years National has handled election donations far better than any other party.  

 

Here are the three top issues – reform, reform, reform.

A good opposition would be pointing out that in six years National has not reformed any major area government spending.  The Right/Center has noticed.  As ACT puts out its new ideas to reform education, health and social welfare this poll says ACT will rise in the polls. 

 

License to burgle

The police budget has been frozen for the fifth consecutive year and Government had no immediate plan to increase it again before 2018.  National is really out of touch on crime.  According to the Treasury there are approximately 120,000 burglaries a year.  What the government is saying is that 480,000 burglaries over the next four years are OK.  Statistically that is the equivalent of every house in Auckland being burgled.  Only ACT says this epidemic of burglary by professional burglars is unacceptable.  Cutting the Police budget is not the way to stop it. Jamie Whyte has done an excellent You Tube clip that not only puts ACT’s 3 strikes for burglary but also shows why he is the most popular Right/Center politician. See for yourself www.act.org.nz

The Letter - 26 May 2014

26 May 2014

 

What a difference a budget makes


ACT has the best polling.  The party did a 2000 nationwide online survey of 2000 likely voters 5-12 May before the Budget 15 May. Comparing ACT’s poll with the TVNZ One poll yesterday it shows National got a big bounce out of the Budget.  The spectacular failure of the opposition to deliver any dirt on Judith Collins has also resulted in a blow back on NZ1st, Labour and the Greens.  

 

Right/Center voters unhappy                      

National producing Labour-lite policies may be electorally successful but ACT’s poll shows Right/center voters are not happy.  They know the government is wasting their money in health, education and welfare.

 

Most popular Right/Center politician

It is Jamie Whyte.  Public polls ask the wrong questions.  “Who do you want to be PM?” biases the result to the existing PM.  Political parties ask a much better question “Do you have a favourable/unfavourable opinion of…”  John Key is the most popular in the public polls but right/center voters (18% of the electorate) have an unfavourable view of Key, favourable 39% /unfavourable 52%.  Key is competing with David Cunliffe and just 13% of right/center voters have a favourable view of Cunliffe.  Jamie Whyte is the most popular leader with the right/center voters with 45% favourable to 22% unfavourable.

 

We were incredulous too

We said to our pollster “John Key is the most popular PM in the history of polling.  Are you sure Jamie Whyte is more popular?” Gene Ulm checked the results. “It is correct.  If we had realized Jamie Whyte after only 70 days as leader was so well known we would have asked more questions about him”.  As an aside the poll shows why John Key is so electable.  If you lead a major party what matters is your cross party appeal.  When many of your opponent’s supporters prefer you to their own leader you are hard to beat.  When you lead a third party then it is vital your supporters like you.  It is why NZ1ST gets votes.  ACT was not polling in depth Green supporters but the results show the Greens have a problem.  Green voters are gaining an unfavourable view of Russell “Aussie” Norman.  Not all Aussie reds are drinkable.

 

Good guys finish last

But they start first.  ACT has picked the right leader.  If voters have an unfavourable impression, as they do of David Cunliffe, then he is the wrong person to be carrying the message.  (The right message carrier for Labour was Shane Jones.  Watch the hidden microphone pick up Hone telling Shane to join NZ1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ff_T6IGfjiA). If voters have a favourable impression of the message carrier as they do of Jamie Whyte then they will listen to the message.

 

ACT is on one percent

Actually that is good news.  It shows ACT’s poll is accurate.  In this massive survey of voters’ attitudes the voters are told what ACT’s policies are.  At the end of the survey voters are asked again how they are voting.  It is duplicates what happens in an election campaign.  In the post survey question 11% say they are considering voting ACT.  That is 12 MPs. 

 

Epsom is crucial

Many of the 11 percent are waiting to see if ACT will win Epsom.  ACT is conducting a telephone survey of the whole Epsom electorate.  David Seymour is now narrowly in first place.  But when National voters are asked if they will vote tactically to ensure John Key is PM a further 40% say they will vote ACT. Even if Labour voters vote tactically they cannot stop David Seymour from winning. This is a better position at this stage than Rodney Hide was polling when he won.  David has momentum. ACT will win Epsom.   

 

Oravida is a non-issue

ACT’s big poll was taken at the height of the “cash for access” scandal.  It shows the issue has not changed anyone’s vote. The Opposition has wasted a month of parliamentary time.  Promising a king hit and delivering hot air has hurt the Opposition’s credibility. Calling your opponent a paedophile has shocked voters.  Even the Opposition’s cheer leaders in talk back radio do not want to go down that route. 

 

Wrong issue

We always thought that the Opposition was mistaken in picking election funding.  It reminds voters that the Auditor–General said Labour misappropriated hundreds of thousands of dollars to fund their elections.  It reminds voters of the Owen Glenn affair.  Why was Russell Norman visiting the Dotcom mansion? It also reminds voters that over the years National has handled election donations far better than any other party.  

 

Here are the three top issues – reform, reform, reform.

A good opposition would be pointing out that in six years National has not reformed any major area government spending.  The Right/Center has noticed.  As ACT puts out its new ideas to reform education, health and social welfare this poll says ACT will rise in the polls. 

 

License to burgle

The police budget has been frozen for the fifth consecutive year and Government had no immediate plan to increase it again before 2018.  National is really out of touch on crime.  According to the Treasury there are approximately 120,000 burglaries a year.  What the government is saying is that 480,000 burglaries over the next four years are OK.  Statistically that is the equivalent of every house in Auckland being burgled.  Only ACT says this epidemic of burglary by professional burglars is unacceptable.  Cutting the Police budget is not the way to stop it. Jamie Whyte has done an excellent You Tube clip that not only puts ACT’s 3 strikes for burglary but also shows why he is the most popular Right/Center politician. See for yourself www.act.org.nz

Pages